Hemp History



PEACE – POT FOR PEACE, PEACE FOR POT


The HEMP Embassy has always actively advocated the reintegration of the hemp plant into people’s lives.

In the 1930′s Hemp was thrust aside in the rush to embrace the emerging synthetics industry, and in the desire to overtake the hemp industry altogether, they threw out the baby with the bath water in a deluge of negative publicity. The rising temperance movement was targeted with this publicity, and after the failed experiment in alcohol prohibition, the movement was left with the prohibition of other drugs as a consolation prize, which just happened to allow a small group of pharmaceutical companies to gain a monopoly on medical drug production and pricing.

We feel that Hemp has been demonised by industrial competitors and venal politicians for their own advantage, depriving humanity of a very useful plant, which, in the drug context, is far less harmful than alcohol, heroin, amphetamines, cocaine, or even antidepressants.




United Nations flag
WORLD HEMP HISTORY


A Potted Perspective:

At the beginning of what we know about man’s historical relationship with hemp, ten thousand years ago in China, it was used for fibre, oil, medicine, and as an entheogen (drug used to achieve a spiritual state). Four thousand years ago they made papyrus in Egypt. The plant was spreading. Two thousand years ago the Egyptians found a way to make paper from hemp. A thousand years ago hemp found its way to Europe, and was used for rope, sails, cloth, fuel, paper, paint, food and medicine. Five hundred years ago when Portuguese sailing ships began to explore beyond the known shores, the demand for hemp rope and sails grew rapidly making hemp a resource of strategic importance to all seafaring nations. When explorers got to North America, there was already a native strain of hemp growing there. The circle was complete. From its beginnings in China hemp had come to be a vital resource grown all around the world. It was as important to trade then as oil is now.

The year 1839 saw the introduction of the screw propeller which spelt the end of the sailing ship era and also the first Opium War in China broke out when Britain backed the right of British merchants to sell opium in China, which the Chinese government had wanted to stop. It was essentially a trade war to open up Chinese markets, but hinged on Opium.

In the New World goldrushes of the 1800s there was racial tension between Chinese and European miners, reflected in laws passed by governments of the day. Opium was then considered a “filthy Chinese practice” and this is ironic considering opium was forced on the Chinese to balance the Tea trade going the other way.

While being an opium smoker was socially unacceptable, in the late eighteen hundreds miracle cures, nostrums, tonics, baby soothers and patent medicines multiplied, adroitly using the media to market their wares. There were no regulations at the time to control any of this. They were consumed by a gullible public, perhaps avoiding the expense of doctors. Some people became addicted to preparations containing opiates or cocaine. By the time alcohol prohibition came around, the general populace were familiar with the concept of addiction.

The Twenties had brought notions of town planning, public education and public health. There were campaigns to increase literacy generally and reduce mortality rates in children. This included school health, school milk and vaccination programs.

Science though is not the only influence on world affairs. The Christian church does not have a visible history of using entheogens, and generally views drugs as more the Devil’s work than God’s. (Wine, as used in Christian rituals, is not used for intoxication or to achieve a spiritual state.) Many Christian women of the Twenties campaigned for voting rights and temperance. They saw alcohol as a destroyer of families, and helped bring about the US prohibition era. Alcoholics and drug addicts were seen as slaves to their drugs, and it was thought by many wishful thinkers that prohibition laws would make those slaves free.

These other drugs were generally thought of as Un-Christian, Un-American or Un-Australian and originating with another race. Opium was touted as a Chinese drug, cocaine was South American, and cannabis was Mexican or Arabic. Racism visibly entered the equation.

Some newspapers of the Thirties exploited all these sentiments mercilessly. So did politicians.

A cheaper fast-yellowing paper was by then being made from bleached woodchip for newspapers, and nylon rope came onto the market. Synthetics were seen as a sunrise industry and enthusiastically embraced as the way of the future at the time.

All of these factors contributed to governments seeking ways to control drug use, and not allow people to self medicate. Pharmaceutical companies and regulations ensuring the purity and safety of food and drugs emerged. While this move from quackery to government and science approved medicine had its good points it also created the medical and pharmaceutical monopolies of today.

States rights in the US are part of the equation. The US constitution gave the states rights to avoid the potential tyranny of a central government, but the Federal US government has consistently sought ways to gain power over the states, and uses interstate commerce provisions to deem crimes federal and take jurisdiction. The states have not always agreed with the federal view, and frictions do exist.

The prohibition of alcohol came and went as it was deemed a failure, but the prohibition of a number of drugs remained, including hemp/cannabis. With alcohol prohibition the rise of enterprise level gangs, public corruption, gang warfare, and crime was an unexpected consequence of such good intentions. While the continued prohibition of other drugs may have mollified the temperance movement and allies, it also left territory for the abusers of alcohol prohibition to move into.

America in its ascendancy promoted and encouraged the adoption of like laws through the UN and trade agreements. It was an attempt to achieve globally, by the same means an aim that had failed locally. In this case legislating for conformity created a new criminal class and attracted a non-conformist reaction.

While only a few used cannabis and police did not have computer records this probably did not affect a huge number of lives statistically, but in the Sixties cannabis use spread among all classes of the younger white generation, and increased in use each year following.

Richard Nixon saw the general increase in drug experimentation and use as a matter of national urgency and gave us the term “Drug War” as he and his successors sought to control a cultural phenomenon. Cannabis was declared the front line. One generation of beliefs declared war on another generations.

By that time computers had made it possible for every misdemeanour of your youth to haunt your whole life.

Now there are so many drug users in prison that governments are privatising prisons in a bid to reduce the expense. The Drug War might look sane to some from the outside, but most within see it as a form of fearful madness with one type of human outlawing another and discriminating on the basis of a small point of difference. As a self proclaimed real criminal in Grafton jail once told me with dismay, “They lower the tone of the place! Used to be all real crims in here!” – I did not bother telling him I was there for cannabis.

Please try to imagine walking in the shoes of a cannabis smoker. Help end prohibition. Seek saner solutions.


Yearstones and Mileposts in Hemp History

8500 BC: Chinese history tells that hemp was used for fibre, oil, and as medicine.

3727 BC: Cannabis called a “superior” herb in the world’s first medical text, Shen Nung’s Pen Ts’ao, in China.

2700 BC: The oldest complete human body ever found was wearing a hemp blouse with a silk like quality in the Alps near the Italian border. The body had been buried by ice for four thousand years, and was exposed by a heat wave.

The oldest “stash”: Nearly two pounds of still-green plant material found in a 2,700-year-old grave in the Gobi Desert was identified in 2008 as the world’s oldest marijuana stash, according to a paper in the Journal of Experimental Botany. A barrage of tests proves the marijuana possessed potent psychoactive properties and casts doubt on the theory that the ancients only grew the plant for hemp in order to make clothing, rope and other objects. The body is assumed to be that of a shaman, and in the absence of smoking implements, that the cannabis was ingested or thrown on a fire and inhaled as practiced by the later Scythians,

2000 B.C. – 1400 B.C. Cannabis mentioned in the Atharvaveda (Science of Charms) as “sacred grass”. Referred to as bhang or bhanga. The legend of Shiva, Lord of Bhang

1550BC: The Ebers Papyrus (named after George Ebers) is an ancient Egyptian medical text (era 1,550 BC). It’s the oldest known (complete) surviving medical text book still in existence, and mentions medical marihuana (known then as Sum-Sum-et).

1500 BC: Cannabis-using Scythians sweep through Europe and Asia, settle down everywhere, and invent the scythe.

700 B.C. – 600 B.C. The Zoroastrian Zend-Avesta, an ancient Persian religious text of several hundred volumes, and said to have been written by Zarathustra (Zoroaster), refers to bhang as Zoroaster’s “good narcotic”

Gautama Buddha
500 BC: Gautama Buddha survives by eating hempseed.

450 BC: Hemp was being cultivated in the middle east for the same purposes as China. Herodotus records Scythians and Thracians as consuming cannabis and making fine linens of hemp. Cannabis was thought to be an Indo-European word specifically of Scythian Origin. The Scythians are considered largely responsible for the spread of cannabis into Europe.

Herodotus, an early Greek ethnographer, in the 5th Century BC wrote of the Scythians and their use of cannabis.

300 BC: Carthage and Rome struggle for political and commercial power over hemp and spice trade routes in Mediterranean.

100 BC: Paper made from hemp and mulberry is invented in China.

1 AD: Recognised birth year of Jesus Christ.

Dioscorides100 AD: Roman surgeon Dioscorides names the plant cannabis sativa and describes various medicinal uses.
Pliny tells of industrial uses and writes a manual on farming hemp.

390 AD: A 14 year old girl dies in childbirth near Jerusalem. In 1993 researchers find residue of the drug with the skeleton of the girl.The researchers said the marijuana probably was used by a mid-wife trying to speed the birth, as well as ease the pain. “Until now,” the researchers wrote in a letter to the journal Nature, “physical evidence of cannabis (marijuana) use in the ancient Middle East has not yet been obtained.”

The seven researchers — from Hebrew University, the Israel Antiquities Authority and the National Police Headquarters forensic division — said references to marijuana as a medicine are seen as far back as 1,600 B.C. in Egyptian, Assyrian, Greek and Roman writings. But physical evidence that the hemp weed, cannabis sativa, was used for that purpose had been missing.

500 AD: First botanical drawing of hemp in Constantinopolitanus. (Latinised version of Constantinople, then a centre of learning.)

600 AD: Germans, Franks, Vikings, etc. all use hemp fibre.

1000 AD approx: Hemp was first introduced into Europe, and by the sixteenth century it was known to be the most widely cultivated crop in the world producing rope, sails, cloth, fuel, paper, paint, food and medicine. The English word ‘hempe’ first listed in a dictionary.

1090 AD: The Assassin movement, called the “new propaganda” by its members, was inaugurated by al-Hasan ibn-al-Sabbah (died in 1124), probably a Persian from Tus, who claimed descent from the Himyarite kings of South Arabia. The motives were evidently personal ambition and desire for vengeance on the part of the heresiarch.” (heresiarch: leader of heretical group) “As a young man in al-Rayy, al-Hassan received instruction in the Batinite system, and after spending a year and a half in Egypt returned to his native land as a Fatimid missionary. Here in 1090 he gained possession of the strong mountain fortress Alamut, north-west of Qazwin. Strategically situated on an extension of the Alburz chain, 10200 feet above sea level, and on the difficult but shortest road between the shores of the Caspian and the Persian highlands, this “eagle’s nest,” as the name probably means, gave ibn-al-Sabbah and his successors a central stronghold of primary importance. Its possession was the first historical fact in the life of the new order.

From Alamut the grand master with his disciples made surprise raids in various directions which netted other fortresses. In pursuit of their ends they made free and treacherous use of the dagger, reducing assassination to an art. Their secret organization, based on Ismailite antecedents, developed an agnosticism which aimed to emancipate the initiate from the trammels of doctrine, enlightened him as to the superfluity of prophets and encouraged him to believe nothing and dare all. Below the grand master stood the grand priors, each in charge of a particular district. After these came the ordinary propagandists. The lowest degree of the order comprised the “fida’is”, who stood ready to execute whatever orders the grand master issued. A graphic, though late and secondhand, description of the method by which the master of Alamut is said to have hypnotized his “self-sacrificing ones” with the use of hashish has come down to us from Marco Polo, who passed in that neighborhood in 1271 or 1272. After describing in glowing terms the magnificent garden surrounding the elegant pavilions and palaces built by the grand master at Alamut, Polo proceeds:

“Now no man was allowed to enter the Garden save those whom he intended to be his Ashishin. There was a fortress at the entrance to the Garden, strong enough to resist all the world, and there was no other way to get in. He kept at his Court a number of the youths of the country, from twelve to twenty years of age, such as had a taste for soldiering.. Then he would introduce them into his Garden, some four, or six, or ten at a time, having first made them drink a certain potion which cast them into a deep sleep, and then causing them to be lifted and carried in. So when they awoke they found themselves in the Garden.

“When therefore they awoke, and found themselves in a place so charming, they deemed that it was Paradise in very truth. And the ladies and damsels dallied with them to their hearts’ content. ..”

“So when the Old Man would have any prince slain, he would say to such a youth: ‘Go thou and slay So and So; and when thou returnest my Angels shall bear thee into Paradise. And shouldst thou die, natheless even so will I send my Angels to carry thee back into Paradise.’”

(from ‘The Book of Ser Marco Polo, the Venetian’, translated by Henry Yule, London, 1875.)

The Assassination in 1092 of the illustrious vizir of the Saljug sultanate, Nizam-al-Mulk, by a fida’i disguised as a Sufi, was the first of a series of mysterious murders which plunged the Muslim world into terror. When in the same year the Saljug Sultan Malikshah bestirred himself and sent a disciplinary force against the fortress, its garrison made a night sortie and repelled the besieging army. Other attempts by caliphs and sultans proved equally futile until finally the Mongolian Hulagu, who destroyed the caliphate, seized the fortress in 1256 together with its subsidary castles in Persia. Since the Assassin books and records were destroyed, our information about this strange and spectacular order is derived mainly from hostile sources.

As early as the last years of the eleventh century the Assassins had succeeded in setting firm foot in Syria and winning as convert the Saljug prince of Aleppo, Ridwan ibn-Tutush (died in 1113). By 1140 they had captured the hill fortress of Masyad and many others in northern Syria, including al-Kahf, al-Qadmus and al-’Ullayqah. Even Shayzar (modern Sayjar) on the Orontes was temporarily occupied by the Assassins, whom Usamah calls Isma’ilites. One of their most famous masters in Syria was Rachid-al-Din Sinan (died in 1192), who resided at Masyad and bore the title ‘shakkh al-jabal’, translated by the Crusades’ chroniclers as “the old man of the mountain”. It was Rashid’s henchmen who struck awe and terror into the hearts of the Crusaders. After the capture of Masyad in 1260 by the Mongols, the Mamluk Sultan Baybars in 1272 dealt the Syrian Assassins the final blow. Since then the Assassins have been sparsely scattered through northern Syria, Persia, ‘Uman, Zanzibar, and especially India, where they number about 150000 and go by the name of Thojas or Mowlas. They all acknowledge as titular head the Aga Khan of Bombay, who claims descent through the last grand master of Alamut from Isma’il, the seventh imam, receives over a tenth of the revenues of his followers, even in Syria, and spends most of his time as a sportsman between Paris and London.

Credit for entry above: THE ASSASSINS by Philip K. Hitti
From _The Book of Grass: An Anthology on Indian Hemp_, edited by George Andrews and Simon Vinkenoog.


1150 AD: Moslems use hemp to start Europe’s first paper mill. Most paper is made from hemp for the next 700 years.

1155 AD – 1221 AD: Persian legend of the Sufi master Sheik Haidar’s of Khorasan’s personal discovery of Cannabis and it’s subsequent spread to Iraq, Bahrain, Egypt and Syria. Another of the earliest written narratives of the use of Cannabis as an inebriant.

Marco Polo
1271 AD: The eating of Hemp was so well known that Marco Polo described its consumption in the secret order of Hashishins, who used the narcotic to fool initiates into thinking they had experienced the afterlife. The Assassins were an early terrorist group. These were people with serious political motivation. (see 1090 AD) Note that the drugs were given to stupefy, so that initiates would awaken in a fake paradise, and believe the master had transported them there through a potion. The cannabis was not a reward or incitement, just a means of rendering initiates unconscious.

First time reports of cannabis have been brought to the attention of Europe.

1419: Henry the Navigator of Portugal born. Up till now ships had hugged the coastline, but under Henry ships began exploration beyond the shores. On the basis of old texts read by Henry, the Madeira Islands were rediscovered in 1420 and claimed by Portugal. In 1427 the Azores were discovered. It was the beginning of the Age of Discovery

“The Age of Discovery, also known as the Age of Exploration, was a period in human history starting in the 15th Century and continuing into the 17th Century, during which Europeans explored the world by ocean searching for trading partners and particular trade goods. The most desired trading goods were gold, silver and spices. Western Europeans used new sailing ship technologies, new maps, and advances in astronomy to seek a viable trade route to Asia for valuable spices which would be uncontested by Mediterranean powers. In terms of shipping advances, the most important developments were the creation of the carrack and caravel designs in Portugal. These vessels evolved from medieval European designs from the North Sea and both the Christian and Islamic Mediterranean. They were the first ships that could leave the relatively placid and calm Mediterranean, Baltic or North Sea and sail safely on the open Atlantic.” Wikipedia

Age of Rigging1492 AD: Hempen sails, caulking and rigging ignite age of discovery and help Columbus and his ships reach America. Many puritans follow over the next few centuries.

1545: Hemp agriculture crosses the continent overland to Chile. Dutch achieve Golden Age through hemp commerce. Explorers find ‘wilde hempe’ in North America.

1564: King Phillip of Spain orders hemp grown throughout his empire, from modern-day Argentina to Oregon.

1571: “The Age of Sail was the period in which international trade and naval warfare were dominated by sailing ships, lasting from the 16th to the mid 19th century. This is a significant period during which square-rigged sailing ships carried European settlers to many parts of the world in one of the most expansive human migrations in recorded history. Like most periodic eras the definition is inexact and close enough to serve as a general description. The age of sail runs roughly from the Battle of Lepanto in 1571, the last significant engagement in which oar-propelled galleys played a major role, to the Battle of Hampton Roads in 1862, in which the steam-powered CSS Virginia destroyed the sailing ships USS Cumberland and USS Congress, finally culminating with the advance of steam power, rendering sail power in warfare obsolete.” Wikipedia

1616-1654: Nicholas Culpepper (1616-1654), listed a variety of medical uses of the common european hemp (Cannabis sativa), including anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and anti parasitic activity

1620: Mayflower carried the Pilgrim Fathers to New Plymouth. America beckons to many religious groups looking for a new start for their followers to escape persecution or worldliness.

1630: John Winthrop and many Puritans migrate to America

1631: Hemp used as money throughout American colonies.

1636: Harvard founded by Puritans

1762: In the U.S. the state of Virginia rewarded farmers with bounties for hemp culture and manufacture, and imposed penalties upon those who did not produce it. George Washington grew hemp for fibre and recreational use, and Thomas Jefferson acquired the first American patent for his hemp break, a device used to separate the hemp stalk into usable hurds and fiber with greater speed than the retting of past. Without hemp America could not have successfully waged the revolution, and for the next one hundred and fifty years hemp enjoyed the position as America’s top cash crop.

1772: Samuel Taylor “Estese” Coleridge born in England. Writes beautiful poetry, but spends his life battling opium addiction. (1772-1834)

1807: Czar Alexander of Russia was forced to sign the treaty of Tilser, which cut off all legal Russian trade with Great Britain, its allies, or any other neutral nation ship acting as agents for Great Britain. Napoleon hoped to stop Russian hemp from reaching England, thereby destroying Britains navy by forcing it to cannibalise sails, ropes and rigging from other ships; Napoleon believed that Britain, starved of hemp, would be forced to end its blockade of France and the continent. As a result of Napoleons actions, hemp, which normally sold at twenty five pounds per tonne, reached a price of one hundred and eighteen pounds per tonne in 1808.

1815: The first paddlewheel steamships began to ply between the British ports of Liverpool and Glasgow. It is the first sign of changing times in the shipping business. Shipping will slowly change to powered craft over the following century.

Hamme1818: The old (left) coat of arms for the Belgian town of Hamme was granted on January 31, 1818 and confirmed on May 13, 1913. The arms show on the right half a branch of a hemp plant and on the left half a branch of a flax plant (with blue flower). Both were important crops in the early 19th century. Hemp was used for ropes, flax for linen.

1822: Thomas De Quincy published “Confessions of an English Opium Eater”, which became his masterpiece. In addition, he wrote numerous essays on political, social, critical, historical and philosophical subjects.

1839: The first Opium War between Great Britain and China. Early in the 19th cent., British merchants began smuggling opium into China in order to balance their purchases of tea for export to Britain. In 1839, China enforced its prohibitions on the importation of opium by destroying at Guangzhou (Canton) a large quantity of opium confiscated from British merchants. Great Britain, which had been looking to end China’s restrictions on foreign trade, responded by sending gunboats to attack several Chinese coastal cities. China, unable to withstand modern arms, was defeated and forced to sign the Treaty of Nanjing (1842) and the British Supplementary Treaty of the Bogue (1843). These provided that the ports of Guangzhou, Jinmen, Fuzhou, Ningbo, and Shanghai should be open to British trade and residence; in addition Hong Kong was ceded to the British. Within a few years other Western powers signed similar treaties with China and received commercial and residential privileges, and the Western domination of China’s treaty ports began.

William B. O’Shaughnessy (1809–1889/90), an Irish medical doctor stationed
in Calcutta, India, published in 1839 a comprehensive study on Indian hemp. Thanks
mainly to his “On the Preparations of the Indian Hemp or Gunjah”, Cannabis indica now
also became recognised within European-school medicine. O’Shaugnessy used various
hemp compounds in his investigations, partly with great success, against the following
indications: rheumatism, rabies, cholera, tetanus, convulsions and delirium tremens.
With hashish he had found a well-suited medicine to give his patients relief, and in the
case of cramps, even total disappearance of symptoms. For concluding remarks, he
wrote: ‘The presented cases are a summary of my experience with cannabis indica, and
I believe that this medicine is an anticonvulsivum of great value’ (O’Shaughnessy, 1839).

In England Thomas Petit Smith, an engineer, built a screw steamship that proved a complete success. The vessel was a hundred and twenty five feet long, twenty-two foot beam, and thirteen feet deep, and named .the Archimedes. He took this vessel to Bristol in 1842, where marine engineer Isambard K. Brunel, (see 1840) at once recognised its advantages, changed the “Great Britain”‘s plans, and introduced a screw propeller in place of the paddlewheels.

1840: The Great Western Company in Britain employ the chief marine architect and engineer of that time, Isambard K. Brunel. The Great Western Company asked him to devise a vessel that would eclipse any craft afloat, and he advised the building of a three thousand ton iron ship. His plans resulted in the Great Britain. Brunel’s original designs were for a side-wheeler, but were changed to a screw propeller while the hull was being built. Thereafter the use of a screw propeller grew more and more common, and the design evolved into the even more efficient propellers of today. The Great Britain still carried masts and sails in case of engine problems. The glory days of sail may have been numbered, but shipping still needed rope and the public were slow to trust and accept these new metal hulled vessels and their engines. Sailships remained viable into the 1920s.

1842: Baudelaire, 19th century French poet, translator, and literary and art critic, received his inheritance in April 1842 and rapidly proceeded to dissipate it on the lifestyle of a dandified man of letters, spending freely on clothes, books, paintings, expensive food and wines, and, not least, hashish and opium, which he first experimented with in his Paris apartment at the Hôtel Pimodan (now the Hôtel Lauzun) on the Île Saint-Louis between 1843 and 1845.

1847: Mormons settle in Utah under Brigham Young, after years of moving around since beginning in New York with Joseph Smith’s vision around 1830.

1850: Tree-pulp papermaking becomes more cost-effective than hemp through the rise of assembly line manufacturing methods.
Hemp continues to be used for rope, birdseed, and other products. Constant efforts to improve hemp and hemp products by producers and others.
The Gold Rush brings many Chinese. Opium seen as a Chinese drug. Racism enters the equation.

Opium War1856: The second Opium War broke out following an allegedly illegal Chinese search of a British-registered ship, the Arrow, in Guangzhou. British and French troops took Guangzhou and Tianjin and compelled the Chinese to accept the treaties of Tianjin (1858), to which France, Russia, and the United States were also party. China agreed to open 11 more ports, permit foreign legations in Beijing, sanction Christian missionary activity, and legalize the import of opium. China’s subsequent attempt to block the entry of diplomats into Beijing as well as Britain’s determination to enforce the new treaty terms led to a renewal of the war in 1859. This time the British and French occupied Beijing and burned the imperial summer palace (Yuan ming yuan). The Beijing conventions of 1860, by which China was forced to reaffirm the terms of the Treaty of Tianjin and make additional concessions, concluded the hostilities.

Opium in anglo-saxon countries was sometimes referred to as “a filthy Chinese practice”. This seems highly hypocritical when it was the west that forced Opium upon them to maintain Tea supplies.

Alice1865: “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” was published in 1865, by Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, an English writer and brilliant mathematician, under the pen-name he had first used some nine years earlier - Lewis Carroll. “Through the Looking Glass” followed.Although he spent so much of his life in the academic environment, Dodgson’s real passions were always artistic. He loved the theatre and the company of ‘theatricals’. He loved artists and their work. He courted the bohemian life in a way that sometimes compromised the required dignity of his position as an Oxford don. Earlier, in 1861 he had become a deacon of the Anglican church, but, despite his religious background, and in direct defiance of the laws of his college, he refused to become a priest. Through the image of the caterpillar with a hookah he will forever be associated with cannabis.

1869: The Prohibition Party is formed. Gerrit Smith, twice Abolitionist candidate for President, an associate of John Brown, and a crusading prohibitionist, declares: “Our involuntary slaves are set free, but our millions of voluntary slaves still clang their chains. The lot of the literal slave, of him whom others have enslaved, is indeed a hard one; nevertheless, it is a paradise compared with the lot of him who has enslaved himself to alcohol.” [Quoted in Sinclar, op. cit. pp. 83-84]

1874: The Woman’s Christian Temperance Union is founded in Cleveland. In 1883, Frances Willard a leader of the W.C.T.U. forms the World’s Woman’s Christian Temperance Union.

1882: Laws in the United States, and the world, making “temperance education” a part of the required course in public schools are enacted.
The Personal Liberty League of the United States is founded to oppose the increasing momentum of movements for compulsory abstinence from alcohol. [Catlin, op. cit. p. 114]

1886: Congress makes temperance education mandatory in the District of Columbia, and in territorial, military, and naval schools. By 1900, all the states have similar laws. [Crafts et. al., op. cit. p. 72]

Queen Victoria1890:Queen Victoria”s personal physician, J.R. Reynolds described it in 1890 as “One of the most valuable medicines we possess.” In another Lancet article published in 1890, he described the use of cannabis indica for treating insomnia in the senile, alcoholic delerium, neuralgia, migraine, spastic paralysis, and convulsions. He allegedly prescribed tincture of cannabis to Queen Victoria.herself for the treatment of menstrual cramps. Cannabis tincture and an extract made from resin were available from Peter Squire of Oxford St in 1864, and wholesale through the Society of Apothecaries by 1871. Chemists extracted stuff they called cannabene, cannabin tannin, cannabinnene etc but had no idea which, if any, was the “active ingredient” until cannabinol was isolated in 1895. THC was not isolated until 1964.

1893: German inventor Rudolph Diesel published a paper entitled “The Theory and Construction of a Rational Heat Engine,” which described an engine in which air is compressed by a piston to a very high pressure, causing a high temperature. Fuel is then injected and ignited by the compression temperature. Intended fuel is vegetable and seed oils. Vision of a “people’s engine” Petrochemical industry does not encourage this view, and see’s alternative use of seed oils instead of gasoline as threat to future sales.

1894:The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report (1894) to the British government, comprising some seven volumes and 3,281 pages, is by far the most complete and systematic study of marijuana undertaken to date. Because of the rarity and, perhaps, the formidable size of this document, the wealth of information contained in it has not found its way into contemporary writings on this subject. This is indeed unfortunate, as many of the issues concerning marijuana being argued in the United States today were dealt with in the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report.

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/effects.htm

“Viewing the subject generally, it may be added that the moderate use of these drugs is the rule, and that the excessive use is comparatively exceptional. The moderate use practically produces no ill effects. In all but the most exceptional cases, the injury from habitual moderate use is not appreciable. The excessive use may certainly be accepted as very injurious, though it must be admitted that in many excessive consumers the injury is not clearly marked. The injury done by the excessive use is, however, confined almost exclusively to the consumer himself; the effect on society is rarely appreciable. It has been the most striking feature in this inquiry to find how little the effects of hemp drugs have obtruded themselves on observation. The large number of witnesses of all classes who professed never to have seen these effects, the vague statements made by many who professed to have observed them, the very few witnesses who could so recall a case as to give any definite account of it, and the manner in which a large proportion of these cases broke down on the first attempt to examine them, are facts which combine to show most clearly how little injury society has hitherto sustained from hemp drugs ” : From the report.

The English approach was that if people were doing something you didn’t want them to, that wasn’t covered by the commandments, you taxed it and made it expensive. Putting them in jail would only cost the government to no benefit.

1895: Cannabinols isolated and extracted.

1900: Diesel runs his engine on peanut oil at World’s Fair.

1903: Wikipedia says Coca-Cola used to contain an estimated nine milligrams of cocaine per glass, but in 1903 it was removed, in an atmosphere of rising public concern over drug laced beverages and patent medicines. Coca-Cola still contains coca flavouring. After 1904, instead of using fresh leaves, Coca-Cola started using “spent” leaves—the leftovers of the cocaine-extraction process with cocaine trace levels left over at a molecular level. To this day, Coca-Cola uses as an ingredient a cocaine-free coca leaf extract prepared at a Stepan Company plant in Maywood, New Jersey.

1905: The rise of “patent medicines”, “tonics”, “baby soothers”, “colic cures” and “cure-alls” mercilessly marketed to a gullible public and often containing addictive ingredients leads to attempts to control and regulate medical compounds. Public awareness and fear of “addiction” grows. Self medication is to be frowned upon and medication control given to pharmaceutical companies and medical doctors.

1906: First US Foods and Drugs Act passed.

1909: Shanghai International Opium Conference was held at the insistence of USA, supported by European powers, China, Japan, Siam and Persia.

1910: The Foster Anti-narcotic Bill of 1910, the first of a series of draft statutes that led to the Harrison Act, included cannabis. Only the vigorous lobbying of the wholesale drug industry prevented its appearance in the final legislation.

1911: An Opium Conference at the Hague drafted the first treaty which attempted to control opium and cocaine through world wide agreement. In that year, Henry Finger, a California druggist newly appointed as a delegate to the Hague conference wanted the US delegation to propose cannabis control because of California’s problem with a “large influx of Hindoos….demanding cannabis indica” but was told that Italy already had a proposal.( See http://www.cfdp.ca/giffen.htm)

1912: Hague International Convention on Narcotics – to control the production and distribution of raw and prepared opium (morphine and cocaine); it required parties to Convention to ‘examine the possibility of making it a penal offence to be in illegal possession of’ drugs covered by the treaty.’

1915: Utah passed the first state anti-marijuana law. Mormons who had gone to Mexico in 1910 returned smoking marijuana. It was later outlawed in that state as a result of the Utah legislature enacting all Mormon religious prohibitions as criminal laws. Thus Utah first state to enact laws against use of marijuana.

1917: George W. Schlicten patented the Hemp Decorticator; a farm-machine that mechanically separates the fibre in the Hemp stalk. Heralds serious threat to wood pulping industry.

1938 Assassin of Youth1920: In England the Dangerous Drugs Act came into force. Of interest here is that while the Americans also outlawed the use of heroin for medical purposes, the English upheld this usage and even found the provision of opiates, in this case heroin, to addicts to be acceptable medical practice.

The Hague treaty of 1912 was ‘as leaky as a sieve’ because it allowed the states to determine for themselves when and how they would fulfil their obligations with regard to opium, which of course kept the use of opium legal until that time. The chemical derivatives did, however, fall under this commitment: that their use was illegal, making these substances more than opium, the object of the battle. To make this battle more effective the League of Nations held two conferences which led to two Geneva Conventions: one of 11 February and one on 19 February 1925.

The Conspiracy View

Also around this time,William Randolph Hearst, media mogul, billionaire and model for Orson Welles’ “Citizen Kane”, campaigns against new drug “marijuana”. Most didn’t realise Hemp was the same thing. His aggressive efforts to demonize cannabis were so effective, they continue to colour popular opinion today.

Hearst owned a good deal of timber acreage; one might say that he had the monopoly on this market. He also had paper-mill holdings, and a national network of newspapers and magazines to spread wildly inaccurate and sensational stories of the evils of cannabis or “marihuana”. Other tabloids jumped on the bandwagon, printing similar stories about crazed mexicans and negros committing hienous crimes under the influence of marihuana.

The sheer number of newspapers, tabloids, magazines and film reels that Hearst controlled enabled him to quickly and effectively inundate American media with his propaganda. Hearst preyed on existing prejudices by associating cannabis with Mexican workers who he said threatened to steal American jobs and also African-Americans. With no strong voice to the contrary, Hearst was persuasive in his appeal to prejudice.

Hearst was not alone in his efforts to demonise hemp.

The new techniques would also make hemp a more viable option for fabric and plastics. DuPont chemicals, which at this time specialized in the chemical manufacturing of synthetic fibre and plastics, and chemicals used in the process of pulping paper might have seen hemp products as competition.

It was said Hearst and Lammont DuPont had a multi-million dollar deal in the works for a joint papermaking venture. These two moguls, together with DuPont’s banker, Andrew Mellon, combined and co-ordinated their efforts to demonise “marijuana”.

Hearst’s “yellow journalism” campaign (so called because the paper developed through his and DuPont’s methods aged and yellowed rapidly) and the 1930 appointment of Mellon’s nephew-in-law, Harry J. Anslinger, to Commissioner of the newly created Federal Bureau of Narcotics put them in control of US Federal drugs policy. Anslinger was a committed prohibitionist.



The Race and Culture War View

Pot activist Jack Herer’s book The Emperor Wears No Clothes is the prime source for the hemp-conspiracy theory. It alleges that in the mid-1930s, “when the new mechanical hemp fiber stripping machines to conserve hemp’s high-cellulose pulp finally became state of the art, available and affordable,” Hearst, with enormous holdings in timber acreage and investments in paper manufacturing, “stood to lose billions of dollars and perhaps go bankrupt.” Meanwhile, DuPont in 1937 had just patented nylon and “a new sulfate/sulfite process for making paper from wood pulp” — so “if hemp had not been made illegal, 80 percent of DuPont’s business would never have materialized.”

Herer, a somewhat cantankerous former marijuana-pipe salesman, deserves a lot of credit for his cannabis activism. He was a dedicated grass-roots agitator for pot legalization during the late 1980s, perhaps the most herb-hostile time in recent history. Despite a substantial stroke in 2001, he soldiers on; he’s currently campaigning to get a cannabis-legalization initiative on the ballot in Santa Barbara, California. The Emperor — an omnivorous conglomeration of newspaper clippings and historical documents about hemp and marijuana, held together by Herer’s cannabis evangelism and fiery screeds against prohibition — has been a bible for many pot activists. Unearthing a 1916 Department of Agriculture bulletin about hemp paper and a World War II short film that exhorted American farmers to grow “Hemp for Victory,” Herer more than anyone else revived the idea that the cannabis plant was useful for purposes besides getting high. Unfortunately, he’s completely wrong on this particular issue. The evidence for a “hemp conspiracy” just doesn’t stand up. It is far more likely that marijuana was outlawed because of racism and cultural warfare.

Twentieth-century cannabis prohibition first reared its head in countries where white minorities ruled black majorities: South Africa, where it’s known as dagga, banned it in 1911, and Jamaica, then a British colony, outlawed ganja in 1913. They were followed by Canada, Britain and New Zealand, which added cannabis to their lists of illegal narcotics in the 1920s. Canada’s pot law was enacted in 1923, several years before there were any reports of people actually smoking it there. It was largely the brainchild of Emily F. Murphy, a feminist but racist judge who wrote anti-Asian, anti-marijuana rants under the pseudonym “Janey Canuck.” All of this happened before Hearst, DuPont, and Anslinger appeared, so they did not cause prohibition, even if they may have exploited it.

In the United States, marijuana prohibition began partly as a throw-in on laws restricting opiates and cocaine to prescription-only use, and partly in Southern and Western states and cities where blacks and Mexican immigrants were smoking it. Missouri outlawed opium and hashish dens in 1889, but did not actually prohibit cannabis until 1935. Massachusetts began restricting cannabis in its 1911 pharmacy law, and three other New England states followed in the next seven years.

The hemp-conspiracy theory blames that law on Hearst and DuPont’s plot to suppress hemp paper and cloth. The theory is that the invention of a hemp processor known as the “decorticator” made it easier, faster and much more cost-effective to extract hemp fiber from the stalks. In February 1938, Popular Mechanics hailed hemp as the “New Billion Dollar Crop.” In response, Hearst and DuPont, scared by the prospect of hemp’s resurrection as a competitor for their products, schemed to eliminate the plant.

However, The Emperor makes only three specific claims to support that theory. One is the anti-marijuana propagandizing of the Hearst newspapers. Second, it claims that Anslinger’s anti-pot crusade was on behalf of Pittsburgh banker Andrew Mellon, who supposedly was DuPont’s “chief financial backer,” lending the company the funds it needed to purchase General Motors in the 1920s. And finally, The Emperor argues that DuPont anticipated the Marihuana Tax Act in its 1937 annual report, which worried that the company’s future was “clouded with uncertainties” — specifically about “the extent to which the revenue-raising power of government may be converted into an instrument for forcing acceptance of sudden new ideas of industrial and social reorganization.”

None of these claims stand up.

Claim 1: Hearst the propagandist

According to W.A. Swanberg’s extensive biography Citizen Hearst, the Hearst chain was actually the nation’s largest purchaser of newsprint — and when the price rose from $40 a ton to over $50 in the late 1930s, he fell so deep in debt to Canadian paper producers and banks that he had to sell his prized art collection to avert foreclosure. “It therefore seems that it would have been in Hearst’s interest to promote cheap hemp paper substitutes, had that been a viable alternative,” Dale Gieringer wrote in his article, calling the hemp-conspiracy theory “fanciful” and a “myth.”

In any case, the Hearst papers never needed hidden self-interest to trumpet fiendish menaces. The expression “yellow journalism” comes from Hearst’s campaign for a war against Spain in 1898. And from the 1930s on, his papers were finding RED SUBVERSIVES and PINKO FELLOW-TRAVELERS under every bed. In 1935, a University of Chicago professor accused of being a Communist by the Hearst-owned Herald-Examiner told the Nation that the reporter covering him had admitted, “We do just what the Old Man orders. One week he orders a campaign against rats. The next week he orders a campaign against dope peddlers. Pretty soon he’s going to campaign against college professors. It’s all the bunk, but orders are orders.”

Claim 2: The Anslinger-DuPont Connection

There was an Anslinger-Mellon connection. Anslinger was appointed to head the Bureau of Narcotics by Andrew Mellon, his wife’s uncle, who was treasury secretary in the Herbert Hoover administration. However, it’s unlikely that DuPont needed to borrow money to buy GM in the 1920s, as the company had done very well as the leading manufacturer of explosives for the Allied forces during World War I.

Historians find no evidence of a DuPont-Mellon connection either. “General Motors was historically associated with the Morgan group during that period,” Mark Mizruchi, a professor of sociology and business administration at the University of Michigan, told me in an email interview in 2003. Sociologist G. William Domhoff of the University of California at Santa Cruz, author of Who Rules America?, concurred, saying it was safe to state there was no connection. And in the 440-page tome considered the definitive account of American banking and corporate finance during the Depression era, Mizruchi added, Japanese historian Tian Kang Go does not mention “even the smallest financial connection between DuPont and Mellon.”

Claim 3: Dubious DuPont claims

The argument that DuPont’s 1937 complaint about federal taxes had anything to do with hemp is an extremely dubious stretch. If the company had been talking about the government eliminating a competitor by levying a prohibitive tax, it wouldn’t have been worrying about the uncertainty of foreseeing new federal imposts. It would have been celebrating its newly cleared path. Given the context of the times, it’s almost certain that this statement was merely typical 1930s corporate-class whining about the New Deal’s social programs and business regulations — akin to current corporate-class complaints about government “social engineering.”


Prohibition’s racist history

The belief that marijuana prohibition came about because of the secret machinations of an economic cabal ignores the pattern of every drug-law crusade in American history. From the 19th-century campaigns against opium and alcohol to the crack panic of the 1980s, they have all been fueled by racism and cultural war, conflated with fear of crime and occasionally abetted by well-intentioned reform impulses. (The financial self-interest of the prison-industrial complex has been a more recent development.) The first drug-prohibition laws in the United States were opium bans aimed at Chinese immigrants. San Francisco outlawed opium in 1875, and the state of California followed six years later. In 1886, an Oregon judge ruled that the state’s opium prohibition was constitutional even if it proceeded “more from a desire to vex and annoy the ‘Heathen Chinee’… than to protect the people from the evil habit,” notes Doris Marie Provine in Unequal Under Law: Race in the War on Drugs. In How the Other Half Lives, journalist Jacob Riis wrote of opium-addicted white prostitutes seduced by the “cruel cunning” of Chinese men.

For the rest of the article this is sourced from:

http://moderate.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/debunking-the-hemp-conspiracy-theory/

See also the history section of EnglischeFassungGlobalesRegulierungsmodell.pdf for the happened by “pure chance” point of view.

1923: Canada adds cannabis to a list of prohibited drugs.

1925: Geneva Convention adds cannabis to Hague Convention narcotic list at the urging of the South African colonial government. A permanent Central Opium Board to supervise international trade in controlled drugs is set up.

In 1925, South Africa asked the Advisory Committee on the Traffic in Opium and Dangerous Drugs to consider the inclusion of “marijuana”. The secretariat distributed a questionnaire seeking information about the production, use, and trafficking of this drug. Despite this, the 1925 Convention did not yet include marijuana on the list of narcotics. The Egyptian delegate then introduced a special motion to include it, which was passed.

Signatories were to make it illegal to export Indian Hemp to any country where its use was prohibited. Where sale was permitted, sales were to be monitored by the use of certificates.

The late Robert Kendell commented that

‘a claim by the Egyptian delegation that [cannabis] was as dangerous as opium, and should therefore be subject to the same international controls, was supported by several other countries. No formal evidence was produced and conference delegates had not been briefed about cannabis.’

Robert Kendell, “Cannabis condemned: the proscription of Indian hemp Addiction”, 2003, pages 98, 143–151

1929: The term “cannabis indica” was replaced by “cannabis sativa”in the Hague narcotic list. This was a consequence of a British firm seeking to export “cannabis africanis” to Canada. Advice was sought, and the advice was to use the all-inclusive term “cannabis sativa”.

1930: The (Federal) Bureau of Narcotics (FBN) was established in July that year when President Herbert Hoover appointed that same Harry J. Anslinger its first Commissioner of Narcotics, a position he held under four U.S. presidents, spanning more than three decades.In meetings with hemp industry representatives he tells them that any new laws wont affect legitimate hemp producers.

In America each state has it’s own drug laws, under State’s Rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. The American Federal Government has sought to gain control in this area by relying on the Commerce and Trade provisions of the Constitution to justify national drug laws, and to try to make them binding on the individual states, otherwise federal authorities could only intervene when illegal activities crossed state lines.

When the first set of uniform drug laws were presented to the forty something states, only five or so took them up within the year. Individual states were not that worried about it that there was any great hurry. That’s when the “demon weed, marihuana” stories hit the headlines, scaring the voters, and thus making uniform drug laws a high priority for any state politician that wanted votes.

Stranger Danger

Anslinger never tires of the “marihuana causes death, murder, and insanity” line the whole thirty three years he is in office. He has had more influence on Federal US Drug Policy than any other.

1931: Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods (New York) – signatories to give estimates of legitimate controlled drug needs. Embargoes against signatories exceeding estimates.

1933: At 5:32 P.M. on December 5, 1933, Utah became the required 36th state to ratify the 21st Amendment, thus officially ending National Prohibition. Alcohol controls were gone, but those on other drugs remained in place.

1936: Church group made”Tell Your Children” as an educational film, directed by Louis Gasnier, but the footage was soon bought by “exploitation” film maker Dwain Esper, some extra salacious footage inserted, and it was re-released as “Reefer Madness” in 1938. It was not a success until rediscovered by NORML in the Seventies.
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reefer_Madness

1937: Marijuana Tax Act – $1.00 on every hemp transaction regardless of size, and a mountain of paperwork to be filled in, passed on Anslinger’s brief advice. Crippling blow to reviving hemp industry. Sterilised seed for birdfeed exempted from definition of Marihuana, because this was only irreplaceable use of hemp that was acknowledged. Nothing else adds condition to a bird, or helps them sing, like hempseed. Read the Marijuana Tax Act at: http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/taxact/mjtaxact.htm

Dupont files patent for nylon.

Sunrise industries proclaim product advantages, gain preferential treatment as “the next big thing”, and try to gain commercial advantage over competitors. The petrochemical, drug, and woodpulp paper industries all competed with Hemp products.

Congress was lobbied by William C. Woodward, of the American Medical Association, and Ralph Lozier of the National Oil Seeds Institute, representing the interests of lubricant and paint manufacturers. Woodward testified that the plant was perfectly legal and harmless, and said, tellingly:
“We cannot understand yet, Mr Chairman, why this bill should have been prepared in secret for two years without any initiative, even to the profession, that it was being prepared… No medical man would identify this bill with a medicine untill he read it through, because marihuana is not a drug, simply a name given to cannabis…”
He later wrote to the committee, warning that:
“The obvious purpose and effect of this bill is to impose so many restrictions on the medicinal use as to prevent such use altogether… It may serve to deprive the public of the benefits of a drug that on further research may prove to be of substantial value”

Ralph Loziers of the National Oil Seed Institute testified to the members of the Tax Act committee that “hemp seed… is used in all the Oriental nations and also in a part of Russia as food. It is grown in their fields and used as oatmeal. Millions of people every day are using hemp in the orient as food. They have been doing that for many generations, especially in periods of famine….”. As Loziers noted, it wasn’t just the possibilities of an important food industry which would be squashed by the Marijuana Tax Act, but also the paint and varnish industry would be greatly affected as hemp seed oil was a valuable drying agent and in the two years prior to the installation of the Tax Act 179 million pounds of hemp seed had been imported into the US for this purpose alone. Anslinger said his few words, the same ones, and the Bill was passed.

1938: “New Billion-Dollar Crop” article published by Popular Mechanics. This article revealed the details of the new machine, a decorticator, that removed the fibre from the stalk thereby drastically reducing the human labour factor.

“Assassin of Youth” by H. J. Anslinger & Cortney Riley Cooper published. It is a scaremongering diatribe based on an earlier pamphlet by Anslinger.

“Its first effect is sudden, violent, uncontrollable laughter; then come dangerous hallucinations -space expands – time slows down, almost stands still….fixed ideas come next, conjuring up monstrous extravagances…leading finally to acts of shocking violence, ending often in incurable insanity.”
(opening lines…)

Movie called “Marijuana – Assassin Of Youth” made with Luana Walters, Arthur Gardner, Fay McKenzie, Michael Owen, Dorothy Short, Dorothy Vaughan, Earl Dwire, Fern Emmett, Henry Roquemore, Hudson Fausset, Eddie Johnson, Gay Sheridan,
Directed by Elmer Clifton, Writing credits: Charles A. Browne, Elmer Clifton (story), Leo J. McCarthy
Hilarious exploitation scare film showing good girls turning into fiends after smoking wacky weed. Some versions had the moonlight nude scenes cut. A.K.A. “Assassin of Youth.”

http://www.reefermadness.org/propaganda/rthages.html (More propaganda quotes)

“Reefer Madness” movie re- release.

Canada prohibits production of hemp under Opium And Narcotics Control Act.

1940: “Devil’s Harvest” movie released.

Hemp Car1941: Henry Ford demonstrates hemp-fibre bodied car.[Similar product to fibreglass]

1942: Japanese take the Phillipines, cutting off America’s supply of imported Manilla Hemp products. “Hemp for Victory” Campaign to encourage farmers to cultivate hemp. Exemption from active duty one of the incentives.

1943: “Marihuana, Assassin of Youth, Feeding the God Moloch”, by the Rev. Robert Devine published.

1955: US Hemp farming again banned. The wartime need for rope has ended.


For some time America even denied wartime hemp had been officially grown, until embarassing evidence came into the public domain in the nineteen nineties, forcing an admission.

Grow HEMP for the WAR1961: United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs adopted at America’s urging. Because of international resistance, the penal measures eventually adopted are moderate and devised to avoid conflict with the different legal systems of the Parties.Other countries are increasingly required to adopt Federal U.S. style drug laws. Marihuana is still classed as a narcotic.

1963: Anslinger finally steps down after 33 years of shaping and enforcing US drug policy.

1964: THC isolated in vitro. The extremely delicate and costly equipment needed to manufacture it has left THC solely in the hands of professional laboratories under regulated, contract to a limited number of bona-fide drug researchers.

1965: Teenage Baby Boomers experiment with drugs. Pot invades white america. Flower Power and Hippies challenge cultural assunptions.


1971: United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances. The major novelty in these two conventions was the attention to providing facilities for medical treatment, care and rehabilitation of addicts. Moreover, as Western social attitudes towards drug use became more relaxed in the 1960s and 1970s, the search for more effective non-penal methods of treating and rehabilitating drug users resulted in a more elastic interpretation of international obligations by some states.
However, this did not result in a fundamental change. On the contrary, under the influence of the United States, law enforcement co-operation became a priority for the UN. When, by the mid-1980s, the problem of money laundering grew, so did the growth of the global consciousness of the dangers of the illicit traffic and the need for greater international co-operation.This lead to the 1988 Convention.

1975: Colorado decriminalises on the first of July.

1976: California decriminalises on New Years day. Minnesota follows on the fourth. Ohio in November. Maine decrininalises.

1977: New York state decriminalises in July.

1978: By now California, Colorado, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and Oregon — have in effect decriminalized minor marijuana offences. Some recriminalise after a year or so leaving nine states

In Holland a new policy option is introduced, that of toleration. This implies that activities that in themselves are punishable by law are nevertheless allowed to continue, if the policy makers decide that this option causes less harm. This will be decided on a local level, in a meeting of the mayor, chief of the police and the public prosecutor. So called “house dealers” had been dealing cannabis in youth centres in the years before, but now the decision can be made to allow them to do their job. Furthermore, coffee shops emerge, shops that do sell coffee, tea and soft drinks (in some cases alcoholic drinks also), but whose ultimate reason for existence is the sale of cannabis products. These too are generally left alone, unless they violate the regulations that have been established by the local authorities. The status of these regulations is a curious one: they are binding on a local level, but do not have the force of law. The result is that regional differences in policy crop up and continue to exist till today.

1981: Alaska decriminalises.

1988: United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.

1991: Alaska recriminalises, but court challenge stymies change.

Dutch policy towards the coffee shops is formalised, along the lines that were developed in Amsterdam. Coffee shops are not allowed to advertise their trade, sell hard drugs, be the cause of nuisance, sell to youngsters under 18 (in some municipalities this age is 16) or sell wholesale. What “advertising” means precisely differs from one municipality to the next. In 1994 the criteria are standardised even more: the age limit becomes 18, advertising is better circumscribed. The maximum amount of cannabis that can be sold per customer is set at 30 grams – and dropped to 5 grams in 1996. Local differences still exist in the number of coffee shops allowed and in the sale of alcohol on the premises.

Visit http://www.a-klinikka.fi/transdrug/resources/nl_policy_article.html#Recent history of Dutch drug policy for a very well written and reasoned overview of Dutch Drug Policy. Now why couldn’t Australia be this clued up?

1996: Oregon recriminalises.

1998: Oregon decriminalises again….

2001: Nevada decriminalises.

2003: Canada passes medical marijuana bill, forced to supply patients by courts. Due to unworkability of existing marihuana laws cannabis decriminalised to end legal deadlock. New US Federal Drug Czar appalled, makes veiled threats, but will not attend Canadian enquiry to argue against it.

UK and Switzerland move to decriminalise.

After an appeals court found an initiative to decriminalise cannabis valid, Alaska voters will have a chance to vote for decriminalization on the 2004 ballot. But it may be a moot point, given last month’s appeals court ruling that there is no law against marijuana possession in the home in Alaska.

2004: US Supreme Court refuses to deny doctors the right to suggest cannabis. Declines the case on basis of free speech. Feds wanted ruling denying right to even suggest it. Nine states are decriminalised, and thirty five states have passed legislation recognizing marijuana’s medicinal value. But federal law bans the use of pot under any circumstances.

Britain amended its drug laws in 2004 to downgrade cannabis from a Class B drug to a Class C “soft” drug.

2005: On Tuesday, June 7, 2005, the US Supreme Court dealt a blow to the medical marijuana movement, ruling that the federal government can still ban possession of the drug in states that have eliminated sanctions for its use in treating symptoms of illness.

By a vote of 6 to 3, the court ruled that Congress’s constitutional authority to regulate the interstate market in drugs, licit or illicit, extends to small, homegrown quantities of doctor-recommended marijuana consumed under California’s Compassionate Use Act, which was adopted by an overwhelming majority of voters in 1996.

The ruling does not overturn laws in California and 10 other states, mostly in the West, that permit medical use of marijuana. In 2003, Maryland reduced the maximum fine for medical users of less than an ounce of the drug to $100.

But the ruling does mean that those who try to use marijuana as a medical treatment risk legal action by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration or other federal agencies and that the state laws provide no defense.


http://www.thc.nl/Documents/legislatableEU.htm#Spain (Comparison of European Drug Laws)

July 29th: Marc Emery, Greg Williams, Michelle Rainey, and other Cannabis Culture activists arrested in Canada pending extradition to US for cross border seed sales.

2006: British officials reject an appeal to reclassify cannabis as a Class B prohibited substance. Their rejection was in accordance with the recommendations of the British Advisory Council on the Misuses of Drugs (ACMD) which determined that marijuana’s relative health risks do not warrant increasing penalties for those who use it.

“The harmfulness of cannabis to the individual remains substantially less than the harmfulness caused by substances currently controlled under the [law] as Class B,” such as amphetamines, the ACMD concluded. The agency further added that cannabis presented only a “very small risk” to users’ mental health, including the onset of schizophrenia.


Today: The Federal American government is still trying to stop the world from smoking pot, even for medical purposes as authorised by some of its own state legislatures.

Australia is party to these treaties and has similar laws, though some Australian states have altered or are thinking of altering them. Some Euopean nations are changing their laws. Some U.S. states have long refused to conform to their federal model too. Essentially, this is also a consequence of the United States Federal Government’s continuing desire to gain greater power than that granted to it under the American Constitution, both over it’s own states, and the rest of the world.

“The reasons the pro-marijuana lobby wants marijuana legal have little to do with getting high, and a great deal to do with fighting oil giants like Saddam Hussein, Exxon and Iran. The pro-marijuana groups claim that hemp is such a versatile raw material that its products not only compete with petroleum, but with coal, natural gas, nuclear energy, pharmaceutical, timber and textile companies. It is estimated that methane and methanol production alone from hemp grown as bio-mass could replace 90% of the world’s energy needs. If they’re right, this is not good news for oil interests, and could account for the continuation of marijuana prohibition.” Hugh Downs, (US) ABC Radio Network journalist.

There is that, but I have tried the legal drugs, and some illegal ones, and the one I find least harmful is Cannabis. I’d prefer to see it legal. The furore around it is out of all proportion. The humble plant has aroused some obscure, but powerful fear in conservative forces. None of them can say clearly why or how marihuana is evil, but take it as a tenet of some common faith without question.

What is this automatic alarm, and how do we turn it off? (Editor)


An excellent historical perspective on HEMP Part-1 and Part-2
by Jasmin Malik Chua


MardiGrass 2004The Nimbin MardiGrass Law Reform Rally will be held on the First Sunday in May every year to encourage Australia to change its laws, and for all to have a good time.

Remenber, it is easier to argue with the wise, than it is to argue with the ignorant. Stay cool.

http://archives.hempembassy.net/

If you feel you have information that should be included in this history, or that something is incorrect, feel free to send that information and inclusion will be considered…….

Thank you for pot smoking and may the force be busy elsewhere attending real crimes……





PEACE – POT FOR PEACE, PEACE FOR POT


The HEMP Embassy has always actively advocated the reintegration of the hemp plant into people’s lives.

In the 1930′s Hemp was thrust aside in the rush to embrace the emerging synthetics industry, and in the desire to overtake the old hemp industry altogether, they threw out the baby with the bathwater with a deluge of negative publicity. The rising temperance movement was targeted with this publicity, and after the failed experiment in alcohol prohibition, the movement was left with the prohibition of other drugs as a consolation prize, which also just happened to allow a small group of pharmaceutical companies to gain a monopoly on medical drug production and pricing.

We feel that Hemp has been demonised by industrial competitors and venal politicians for their own advantage, depriving humanity of a very useful plant, which, in the drug context, is far less harmful than alcohol, heroin, amphetamines, cocaine, or even antidepressants.



AUSTRALIAN HEMP HISTORY

From author John Jiggen’s book: “True Hemp in Australia”,
Phillip Charlier’s
“Hemp in British and Australian Colonial History” and other sources.



Before 1788 and European Settlement

Before there were steam and diesel engines, there were canvas sails and ropes made out of hemp. England had difficulty sourcing sufficient hemp in Europe because of treaties between continental powers, and at one stage Napoleon tried to blockade hemp shipments from reaching England as part of his tactics. The loss of the now United States in the War of Independence was a blow to hemp supplies, so when there was discussion of a colony, despite it being on the other side of the world, the potential for hemp production was explored. It has to be remembered that, in this time, rope and sail were as important as oil is today.

Joseph Banks encouraged the growing of hemp by colonies and had noticed and named the New Zealand Flax plant (Phormium Tenax) on his voyage with Cook. It was used by the Maoris for cloth, twine and rope, and Banks was intrigued by its possibilities. In 1779 Banks recommended Botany Bay as a suitable place for a penal settlement in evidence given to a Parliamentary committee.

As a consequence of the American War of Independence (1775–1783) there were a number of Americans who had remained loyal to Britain, fought on their side and lost everything, ending up in England. One of their number, James Matra ( b.1745, in New York, James Magra -changed name by deed poll. Able seaman in British navy by 1762) had travelled with Cook and Banks to the South Seas in 1770 and later made the “Matra Proposals” to British parliament in 1783 with the resettlement of loyalist Americans in mind, adding an amendment after initial discussions suggesting the use of felons by free settlers as a labour force. The British parliament, encumbered with overcrowded prisons through heavy penalties for petty crime, eventually decided on a penal colony. Matra became a diplomat, passing away as Consul in Tangier (1787 – 1806) without returning to England.

Five years after the American War of Independence ended Captain Arthur Phillip arrived in Australia with soldiers and felons in tow, and they did the work of preparing the colony for what was to come.

The usual historical view is that we were a “dumping ground” for prisoners, but Governor Phillip did have instructions to cultivate flax and communicate the results of his endeavors. It was just that there were many other imperatives that needed to be addressed. Initially nearly all energy went into building shelter and producing food.

Some historians present a long term timber and hemp view of colonisation in this period, rather than focus on the emotive “dumping ground” view. This has aroused controversy.

Britain’s need for hemp may have gone without saying, but it would have been taken for granted in those times.

Before Federation:

1788: Sir Joseph Banks, “the Father of Australia”, the man who sent hemp seeds on the First Fleet and recommended the scheme for a convict and hemp colony, must be claimed as hemp’s historical Australian Godfather. He frequently supplied seed to prospective growers to encourage production in British colonies, such was the need of the times with hemp a vital military resource for seafaring nations like Britain.

1793: First free settlers arrive.

1800: As per Royal instruction, the early Governors of New South Wales – Phillip, Hunter and King – did their best to encourage the hemp industry. By 1800, cloth manufacture had begun.

Flax and hemp could both be turned into rope, and in the literature of the day the term “hemp” was used for any rope-making plant, in much the same way vacuum cleaners are referred to now as being hoovers.

The New Zealand plant that Banks had noticed Maoris using for fibre in 1770, and named New Zealand Flax (Phormium Tenax) was examined and experimented with for the next sixty years. Various attempts were made to perfect an economic way to prepare it. The Maori used to hand beat it, but that was too slow for Britain’s needs.

On Norfolk island, work continued growing and trying to find a way to prepare phormium tenax. An experimental planting of European flax was also begun. In Sydney, King (now Governor of New South Wales) set dressers and weavers among the Irish convicts to cultivate European flax and hemp, and “every woman that can spin” to manufacture what these others grew. By the end of 1801, these efforts had produced “279 yards of fine and 367 of coarse linen” and he sent samples home. In 1801, King wrote about European hemp which promised “a very abundant return on the lowlands about the Hawkesbury and Nepean rivers” and “might also be manufactured and sent from hence in cordage”. During his period as Governor, King also had constructed a manufactory for canvas, sacking, blanketing and rope.

1802 : NSW’s governor wrote Banks that he had sown 10 acres of “Indian hemp seeds” that grew “with utmost luxuriance, generally from six to ten feet in height.” The governor and Banks did not seem to know that Cannabis Indica was any different from European hemp.

<Hemp Plant1808 – 1814: Shortage of hemp in Britain due to Napoleon’s blockade. Colonies encouraged to produce hemp.

1813: An expedition was mounted to New Zealand. Included in the crew were some of Samuel Marsdens missionaries. (who had contact with the Maori cheif Ruatara) and Robert Williams, the colonies first rope maker and flax dresser. By 1814, Marsden had obtained 13,000 acres at Kerikeri and started a settlement there of 22, including flax dresser John King.
After his journey to New Zealand, Robert Williams made a long submission to the British government about
phormium tenax. Williams notes in it that: Phillip and King “were at much labor and expense and made great efforts to bring it to perfection at Norfolk Island…but the best mechanicks in Europe have failed in their attempts to manufacture it.”

Note: “Phormium Tenax”, New Zealand Flax. The terms hemp and flax seem interchangeable or collective in this era, as it changes from one to the other in the text quoted. European Flax (Linum usitatissimum) was different to New Zealand flax, and the New Zealand flax did not easily respond to their efforts.

In his report, Williams claimed that he succeeded in solving the mystery of dressing the New Zealand plant. He was stretching the truth.

Very well aware that substantial encouragement was being offered by the British government for processing hemp, Williams further offered: “that the British market may be supplied with large cargoes of hemp and in three years the principle part of the British navy may be supplied from this territory and New Zealand at a great saving from the average price of hemp from the north of Europe.”
This proposal by Williams for the cultivation of native “hemp” in New Zealand and its manufacture into cordage was received with interest in London and had the support of the commissioner of enquiry, J. T. Bigge, who came to Australia to report on the colony’s development and agricultural choices as it moved on from being a penal colony. Australia was now of little use as a penal colony, difficulties having been overcome, and now people genuinely wanted to come. It was no longer a forbidding destination.

1815: The first paddlewheel steamships began to ply between the British ports of Liverpool and Glasgow. It is the first sign of changing times in the shipping business. Shipping will slowly change to powered craft over the following century.

1821: A rope made by Williams from New Zealand “hemp” was tested in Chatham rope yard and showed great strength. Mostly hand prepared (beaten) flax is exported from now to 1860, when a mechanical method of production is perfected.

1822: Williams made plans to go to New Zealand but trouble with his debtor, Samuel Levey, delayed him. (the debts were incurred when two boats were burnt by the Maori’s). To help Williams depart, the colonial government made arrangements for Levey to be paid in cedar and land.

<HEMP

Archibald Bell’s views on developing the colony: “The present mode of farming here seems not to deserve the name of a system. Wheat and maize are indeed almost the only crops raised, this arises in the market for any other produce
…first, public encouragement should be given to the growth of flax and hemp, the rich land on the banks of the Hawksebury and Napean are capable of producing as we know by experience, the most luxuriant crops, the manufacture of which would afford fit employment for female convicts and lame men.
…the propriety of cultivating hemp and flax seems strongly pointed out to notice, as in curing and preparing of so many hands would be required, and would thus ensure for female convicts, (and also lame and infirm old men now a burthen to the crown) a consideration as it respects the female particular of no small importance to the well being of morality.”
Archibald Bell’s views were echoed by Provost Marshall John Cambell in a letter to the new Governor Sir Thomas Brisbane on February 12th 1822.

(Archibald Bell, who presented the argument for New South Wales as a hemp colony to Bigge, was the chief police magistrate in the Windsor area where he was the first paid magistrate and occupied a government house valued at one thousand pounds. A member of the New South Wales Corp, Bell had been in charge of the guard at Government House in 1808 when Bligh was arrested. After Bligh’s arrest, he served as military commandant at the Hawkesbury, and received a grant of a town allotment and 500 acres at Richmond, and a larger grant of 1000 acres. He was one of those “with the largest property and highest respectability” consulted by Bigge, and he was appointed to the Legislative Council in 1832.)

Macarthur campaigned for a wool industry. We all know the outcome. Incidentally, Banks later took some merino sheep back to England. It has been suggested that just as Australia was infested with plants and animals from Europe in this time, so too did England acquire a record number of new species that had travelled the other way as our flora and fauna excited general curiosity and a great botanic and zoological interest.

1839: In England Thomas Petit Smith, an engineer, built a screw steamship that proved a complete success. The vessel was a hundred and twenty five feet long, twenty-two foot beam, and thirteen feet deep, and named .the Archimedes. He took this vessel to Bristol in 1842, where marine engineer Isambard K. Brunel, (see 1840) at once recognised its advantages, changed the “Great Britain”‘s plans, and introduced a screw propellor in place of the paddlewheels.

1840: The Great Western Company in Britain employ the chief marine architect and engineer of that time, Isambard K. Brunel. The Great Western Company asked him to devise a vessel that would eclipse any craft afloat, and he advised the building of a three thousand ton iron ship. His plans resulted in the Great Britain. Brunel’s original designs were for a side-wheeler, but were changed to a screw propeller while the hull was being built. Thereafter the use of a screw propeller grew more and more common, and the design evolved into the even more efficient propellers of today. The Great Britain still carried masts and sails in case of engine problems. The glory days of sail may have been numbered, but shipping still needed rope and the public were slow to trust and accept these new metal hulled vessels and their engines.

1846: Francis Campbell publishes the first edition of the only Australian text on hemp. “A Treatise on the Culture of Flax and Hemp”. This collection of essays was originally serialised in the Australasian. There were two subsequent editions of this book in Campbells lifetime. the third edition being published in 1864. The book was re-published by Wild and Woolley in 1977, along with a marijuana growing guide. Interestingly, the copy of the book in the Mitchell Library in Sydney was donated by John Fairfax MLA, the founder of the Fairfax dynasty.

1856: Victoria imposes duty on opium: 21,890 kg imported in that year, earning £56,979 in duty. The goldrushes and the opium smoking Chinese population they attracted made imposts on opium a good source of revenue.

1859: Settlement creates its own demands for rope and cloth. Demand for hemp in Australia is high, but most seems to be imported. The Sands Directory of New South Wales lists two rope manufacturers in that year. After 1867 the industry grew and expanded. Between 1859 and 1890 about 39 rope businesses were listed. Only eight were in existence by 1890 as business life expectancy was apparently low.

1860:The production of New Zealand flax fibre on a large scale did not commence until the late 1860s, when a machine was invented to beat the green leaf between a revolving metal drum and a fixed metal bar. Metal beaters on the surface of the drum struck the leaf at great speed, stripping away the non-fibrous material and releasing the strands of fibre. This machine (which became known as a “stripper”) produced a much coarser fibre than the Maori hand-dressing process, but one machine could produce about 250 kilograms (a quarter of a tonne) of fibre per day, whereas one Maori worker (using a mussel shell) could produce only one kilogram of fibre in the same time. By 1910 the stripper had been improved to the point where it was capable of producing 1.27 tonnes of fibre per day. This was too late for the era of sail. Steel hulls, engines and screw propellers had become the shipping norm.

1868: Last convicts transported to Australia arrived Western Australia on January 10. Settlers had begun to oppose the practice, and South Australia was theoretically all free settlers, though ex convicts from the east could easily cross the unguarded state borders to start a new life if they wished.

Colonial Monthly publishes the story “Cannabis Indica” written by Marcus Clarke as an experiment while under the influence of cannabis. He is out to thrill his readership rather than scientifically record. “Cannabis Indica” is Australia’s first recorded drug writing.

<Marcus Clarke Exhibition PromoIan McLaren has described Marcus Clarke as “essentially the journalist. He was able to sense a story; he was aggressive and combative, ready to translate his thoughts into arresting words that caught the imagination of the public, or aroused antagonism to his views expressed so forthrightly”

. He was kept busy by the Argus and Australasian, writing leaders and literary articles and reviewing books and theatre. A series of articles, ‘Lower Bohemia’, about Melbourne low life appeared in the Australasian and were particularly successful, being “strong pieces of investigative journalism”.

<Patent Medicine - Cigares de Joy1880 – 1890: The use of now prohibited or restricted drugs was widespread and tolerated to an extent that would cause outcry today. For example laudanum, a household painkiller available without a prescription, was a mixture of opium and alcohol and was used for infants with teething problems. Cigares De Joy, marijuana cigarettes were available in Australia and, to name just two of the numerous drug-laced patent medicines available, Bonnington’s Irish Moss contained opium alkaloids and Ayre’s Sarsaparilla Mixtures contained opium. In the 1890s, morphine lozenges did not come under the existing poisons legislation. Opium was seen as a valuable commodity and was exported in vast quantities from India into China to balance the British Empire’s tea trade. The Opium Wars of 1839-42 and 1856-58 broke out as the Chinese tried to resist the importation of the drug.


1891-1895: Some early opium bills failed. For example, opium growing farmers of Bacchus Marsh in Victoria defeated the passage of a bill ‘to restrict and regulate the sale and use of opium’.

The Sale and Use of Opium Act 1891 (Qld) controlled opium distribution, essentially to protect Aborigines from being paid in opium. The growing awareness of addiction meant growing opposition to free availability.

Opium Act 1895 was applied to South Australia and the Northern Territory, making it an offence to sell or give to ‘any Aboriginal native of Australia’.

< The Three Lawyers 1897: At the Federal Convention, Adelaide, March 1897, the drafting of the Australian Constitution was entrusted to three lawyers shown here: Edmund Barton (standing), John Downer (left) and Richard O’Connor. Edmund Barton went on to become Australia’s first Prime Minister. O’Connor and Barton were appointed to the High Court in 1903.


Act No 17 of 1897 (Qld) forbade sale of opium to Aborigines. Sale of alcohol to Aborigines carried a £50 penalty, opium a £100 penalty.

Post Federation

1900:Federation of the Australian states into a new country. We are Australia.

1901: States give up power to levy customs duties although they retained some Commonwealth duties for some time.

Customs Act 1901 prohibits import of non medicinal opium to stop recreational use spreading beyond Chinese community. Collector of Customs grants licences to doctors and pharmacists.

1905: Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905 (Cth) – controlled packaging, marking and marketing of patent medicines (medicinal opium, morphine, heroin, cannabis and others).

Premiers Conference – decision made to take action against non-medicinal use of opium under pressure from feminist and church groups, as more Europeans were believed to be smoking opium.

Opium Amendment Act 1905 (SA) – risk of fine and imprisonment if non-medicinal opium sold, bartered or given to any race, ‘Asiatics’ risk deportation.

Opium Smoking Prohibition Act 1905 (Vic) – campaign supported by Chinese merchants but focuses on Chinese opium smokers.

1907: Royal Commission in Secret Drugs, Cures and Foods presented to Commonwealth gives first warning of dangers of heroin, used as cough mixture. Commission noted heroin in medicine not controlled.

1908: Police Offences Act (NSW) – offence to sell, smoke or possess preparations of opium for smoking. The Labor leader, W A Holman protested at the use of opium being made an offence at law, when used ‘by an adult man who knows what he is doing and is master of his own actions’.


1910: Joint Commonwealth State Conference – drugs for therapeutic purposes; dispensing and labelling of medicines.

Customs Act s 233B(1) – non medicinal opium wide-ranging offences.

Shanghai International Opium Conference was held at the insistence of USA, supported by European powers, China, Japan, Siam and Persia.

1912: Hague International Convention on Narcotics – control production and distribution of raw and prepared opium (morphine and cocaine); required parties to Convention to ‘examine possibility of making it a penal offence to be in illegal possession of’ drugs covered by the treaty.


1914: Dangerous Drugs Act (UK) – adopts terms of Hague Convention re control of drugs in treaty. Western powers more in touch with opium producing countries.


1920: Australia implements Hague Convention


1925: Geneva Convention adds cannabis to Hague Convention narcotic list, and sets up a permanent Central Opium Board to supervise international trade in controlled drugs.

The late Robert Kendell commented that

‘a claim by the Egyptian delegation that [cannabis] was as dangerous as opium, and should therefore be subject to the same international controls, was supported by several other countries. No formal evidence was produced and conference delegates had not been briefed about cannabis.’

Australia was represented at this conference. The Commonwealth then wrote to all of the states asking them to enact legislation to ban Indian hemp. This is how the NSW Under Secretary of the Colonial Secretary’s Department replied on behalf of this state:

‘The omission of that drug [cannabis] from the operation of the Act would have been of small moment, but having been considered by the conference as required to be included, it might perhaps be as well, if practicable, to bring it within the purview of the dangerous drug laws’

This sentence explains why cannabis is still prohibited in NSW today. On this shaky foundation, the mighty edifice of cannabis prohibition in NSW (and other states) was built.

Robert Kendell, “Cannabis condemned: the proscription of Indian hemp Addiction”, 2003, pages 98, 143–151


<
Opium Den 1926: Australian Opium Proclamation prohibiting Coca leaves and Indian hemp. (This is eleven years before America prohibits hemp.)

1931: Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods (New York) – signatories to give estimates of legitimate controlled drug needs. Embargoes against signatories exceeding estimates.


1953: Ban on medicinal use of heroin. Overprescription/unnecessary prescription by medical profession prohibited.


1961: Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961 (New York) – schedules of drugs adopted at conference of 71 nations:

Schedule I – opiate narcotics, cocaine and cannabis for medical and scientific purposes.

Schedule IV – cannabis, cannabis resin and heroin ‘particularly dangerous’, requiring more stringent controls. Signatories to Convention to adopt whatever methods necessary. Article 36(1) requires signatories to make production, possession, importation and other activities serious offences to be punishable by imprisonment (when committed intentionally).

1964:Cannabis found growing wild in the Hunter Valley, survivors from early Australian crops. Enormous newspaper publicity arouses public interest. Eradication program begun.

1967: Appendix to Narcotic Drugs Act 1967 adopted Single Convention. Domestic manufacturers of narcotic drugs licenced.

1970: American soldiers on R&R from Vietnam buy local pot and introduce more potent strains. Kings Cross becomes a known centre for R&R drug trade.

1971: Convention on Psychotropic Substances extended beyond narcotic drugs to cover drugs not listed in Single Convention Schedules. Dealings to be controlled for medical purposes; more flexibility than Single Convention.


1972: Protocol to Single Convention – treatment or rehabilitation as alternative to conviction or punishment.

<Age of Aquarius1973: Aquarius Festival at Nimbin. Australian Union of Student’s and Peter Stuyvesants put on a festival that begat communes and cannabis and publicity.

1976: Psychotropic Substances Act 1976 incorporated 1971 Convention.

August 12th NSW Police conduct a pre dawn raid on Tuntable Falls Co-operative, rounding up 42 people at gunpoint, loading them into a mixture of vehicles, including a cattle truck. There was a shortage of pot at the time and only a pregnant mothers stash tin and a Sunshine Milk tin containing twelve ounces was found on the entire property. The Police said they would divide it among us to charge us all.

August 29th The Cedar Bay commune is raided by Queensland Police. Using a helicopter, a naval patrol boat and four wheel drives they rounded up the members of the isolated community. Finding only a small quantity of marijuana, the police discharged firearms into water tanks and burned down the hippie’s houses before they left. ZZZ radio broke what would become an international story at the time.

All cannabis charges made in the course of the Tuntable Falls raid were dismissed.

Queensland was the same, with compensation sought and gained by some of the defendants.

1984: South Australia decriminalised minor cannabis offences with a fine in expiation of a charge for cannabis use, referral for assessment with option of treatment and rehabilitation as alternative to prosecution.

1985: NSW comprehensive schedule of drugs prohibited except on prescription.

1992: ACT – small amounts cannabis police discretion re fine (NT follows in 1995).

First Nimbin MardiGrass Law Reform Rally held after years of bi-annual helicopter raids that find little to justify them, unless you believe the bizarrely optimistic $2000.00 a seedling formula the police employ?

1997: In September Police use helicopters to raid the Wytaliba community, between Grafton and Glen Innes in the Mann River valley. Despite being videotaped they abused their powers by refusing to produce a search warrant or identification, and using excessive force. Charges were dismissed and the NSW police force sued.

1999-2000: NSW small amounts of cannabis – police to direct offender’s attention to harms and treatment – police cautioning system.

NSW trial of supervised heroin injecting rooms, modifying prohibition.

2000: The 100 or so alternative lifestylers living at Wytaliba were in the mood to celebrate hard. They’d just been awarded $1.3 million following an unlawful search by police that happened to be captured on video – including one policeman saying “we got no warrant”.

2004: Medical Cannabis flagged by Carr, but nothing happens. Howard can block it.

South Australian expiation notice scheme now only applies to only a single outdoor plant.

In Western Australia from 22 March 2004 police have the discretion to issue a Cannabis Infringement Notice to you if you are aged 18 years and over, and found to be:
– in possession of or using no more than 30 grams of cannabis;
– in possession of pipes or implements for use in smoking cannabis on which there are detectable traces of cannabis;
– growing no more than two outdoor cannabis plants at your principal place of residence, provided that no other person is growing other cannabis plants on the same premises.

Federally the Conservatives consolidated at election time. The size of the mortgage ruled the voters choice. Federally it is still “zero tolerance”.

Raids continue while the drugs of the twenty first century whistle through our village, stimulants that provoke violence and vandalism amongst some of the young. The cannabis smokers are still the same peaceful lot they allways were, still protesting against unfair laws, still putting on the MardiGrass every year, still working to make the world a better place.

CREDIT:

Some of the information and points of view in this Table are taken from John Lonie, A Social History of Drug Control in Australia, Research Paper 8, Royal Commission into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs South Australia, 1979 (The Sackville Commission)

**********************************************

<MardiGrass 2004The Nimbin MardiGrass Law Reform Rally will be held on the First Sunday in May every year to encourage Australia to change its laws, and for all to have a good time.

Remenber, it is easier to argue with the wise, than it is to argue with the ignorant. Stay cool.

http://archives.hempembassy.net/

If you feel you have information that should be included in this history, or that something is incorrect, feel free to send that information and inclusion will be considered…….

Thank you for pot smoking and may the force be busy elsewhere attending real crimes ……


Mail the Hemp Embassy